ArmaGallant: Decks of Destiny Review

ArmaGallant: Decks of Destiny (not that Destiny) is a PS4 exclusive RTS deckbuilding game based around fast paced 1v1 or 2v2 multiplayer arena battles from developer Rock Nano Global. The game boasts a quick tutorial and many different elements to pick from, rather reminiscent of Magic: The Gathering, but lacks a story mode to better get to know the workings of each faction, leaving the player to flounder on his or her own on a pretty steep learning curve. The integration of RTS into what would otherwise likely be another Hearthstone clone is an interesting idea that doesn’t pan out quite like it could have had the maps been made just a bit smaller (this isn’t Starcraft, folks).

The art style is a selling point, however, with good animation quality, but there’s no way to change map perspective other than to scroll around to attend to multiple units. The premium currency (crystals) is priced a bit high as well considering the rewards that come with it, currently $2 for 120 crystals, with 100 being enough to buy a booster pack. You can get booster packs through it if you don’t want to wait to earn up gold in multiplayer, but maybe not quite enough to justify the cost.

Gameplay wise, there’s a lot of variety, which should be expected from a combo like this. 2V2 has the potential to get pretty crazy, especially if all the players know what they’re doing. Sadly, this isn’t the kind of game one can just pick up and go with. There’s no online data bank for the cards, so looking at each individual one while in-game is the only way to access them. The control scheme is good, though, and if this combination of genres ends up being a success, it would be a good standard for other games like it. At the moment the game only has one map, making the game’s price point of almost 40 USD a little steep, especially considering the price of premium currency and the need for a PSN subscription to actually play the game online.

ArmaGallant has a lot of potential. It’s a really interesting idea blending together two genres that aren’t normally associated with one another, but it has a lot of problems, too. A short story campaign wouldn’t go amiss, or an offline mode, or easier ways to earn booster packs in general without having to spend any real world money. A free to play model with maybe a bit more of a focus on DLC and card packs would possibly be a better route to take and would definitely give the developer a larger player base. Right now, it’s a large investment to try out an unknown game from an unknown developer, and sadly there’s very few who are willing to take the risk.

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
Notify of

Recent Articles

10 Things To Remember As A Gaming Content Creator

When you finally realise your dream as a gaming content creator, it can feel like the world is your oyster. To a certain extent,...

How To Host Your Very Own eSports Event

If you’ve never contemplated hosting your own eSports event, now may well be the time to start. eSports events can be amazing fun, bringing...

Game of the Week [09/12/19]

It’s that time again and we’re heading into the second week of December with an exciting feature we’re sure you’ll love. Yes, we know...

iStorage diskAshur Pro 2 HDD 2TB Review – Data Protection

Here’s a sobering fact for you: depending on the size and operational scope of your business, a major data breach could not only cost...

4 Best Fun Video Games of 2019

Every video lover must have noticed the slow progression of video games in 2019. While this might seem a little bit of concern, it...

Related Stories

Stay on top - Get the daily news in your inbox